OBAMA: The ODM Candidate for PRESIDENT – Part 3

Part 3

By Jacquerie

ODM Action Plan as Executed in

Obama’s US Campaign:

A Checklist Comparison

1. Both candidates represent radical factions. Obama’s short list includes Rezko, with his secret MidEast money trail; Wm Ayres with whom he funded Muslim causes; Farrakan, head of the Nation of Islam and many others.

2. Both campaigns are substantially funded by secret PACs, multi-layering contributions which makes them difficult to trace.

3, Both use propaganda denouncing ‘Corruption.” The theme of Obama speeches in Kenya for Odinga have been echoed throughout his own US campaign.

4. Both employ vague rhetoric extolling the need for “ CHANGE!” - the same Kenya ODM battle cry heard, ad nauseum, in Obama’s campaign here.

5. Each identify themselves as leaders of a “ Movement” - as if to deflect attention away from the candidate to incite “mob” energy, most often extolling popular platitudes rather than addressing specific issues.

5. Both employ core strategy of “seek(ing) to elevate the emotions within young constituents .” Consider D. Brazille’s boasts of Obama’s popularity with new voters as well as his primary season targeting of college campuses. Lowest of all these youth grab tactics, may be the current explicit democratic party sponsored internet sex ads, which suggests that single young men will be sex-deprived if they support the senior McCaine over the hip Obama.

6. Ridicule of “old people.” is a strategy to usurp respect for existing leadership. The ODM candidate, by contrast, is surrounded by the youthful “promise of a buoyant future.” Just last week 2 young MSM bloggers extolled how “cool and hip Obama is” describing McCaine as “old and dumpy.” The insinuation is McCain is unfit to lead because of his age. Similar internet insults of both Clintons were rampant during the primary season. One would think we were voting for American Idol, not the leader of the free world!

7. The ODM Action Plan call – “ trigger a class war” by focusing on issues of “ disparity ” explains why Obama, the candidate who touts up “unity” routinely engenders divisiveness between virtually all interest groups. Surely, we recall classic strategy of ancient Roman – to “divide and conquer.”

8. ODM’s adage: “Elevate emotions to gain protest votes” is the “conquest” which follows the incitement of “class warfare” to divide. As a middle aged American, I’ve always been familiar with references to the “middle class” as our country’s great strength. In Obama’s clever dissembling of the “middle class,” we have been subtly shifted to the language of the “ working class “ the “ working poor ”, etc. Clearly the “middle class” is Obama’s worst enemy were it to remain one cohesive

voting bloc. His background of “black theology” holds “middle class-ness” in         contempt as exemplified by many of Reverend Wright’s tirades, Michelle Obama speeches and Obama’s own“ bittergate ” comments . His more recent energy-solution of giving up “your SUV’s and his open disdain for English speaking Americans in Europe follow the same line.

9. When it comes to “reinforce promises of jobs and economic gains to supporters and “retain discipline among the party leadership, we can see a summary of Dean and Axelrod’s  illegitimate Super Delegate sweep, in flagrant violation of the voters in numerous state primaries. Could be the Obama campaign has, as the ODM plan instructs, been remind(ing) these party leaders of their own vulnerability.”

10. Come election day, the ODM call for “manipulation of voter turn-out ” with “discouragement of voter participation in hostile areas.” This was reflected in innumerable reports of Caucus fraud in this spring’s campaign. These were so intentional as to demonstrate careful advance planning. As we all know, it was these caucuses that established Obama’s press “momentum.”  Caucus outcomes, which hardly reflected the “Will of the People, were reported to include aggressive participation busloads of youthful Obama supporters. As caucuses, historically, have involved small groups of local political devotees, verifying documentation of residency, etc. are not usually part of the rules of that process.

11.  We could call last one “when all else fails ”, since the ODM even planned a strategy for “winning” – vehemently implimented after Odinga lost the popular vote. Well organized riots and violence followed large, advance sales of machetes, carried along with gasoline cans, by ODM supporters, into predominantly Christian areas.

Filed under: Politics, Uncategorized , Barack Obama, Kenya, Odinga, Orange Democratic